Fox Island Granite Co. v. American Granite Manufacturers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the decision in Lee was not “clearly wrong” because this Court’s decision in Lee “accords with this Court’s fundamental rules of statutory construction”
• finding that the decision in Lee was not “clearly wrong” because this Court’s decision in Lee “accords with this Court’s fundamental rules of statutory construction”
• finding that the decision in Lee was not “clearly wrong” because this Court’s decision in Lee “accords with this Court’s fundamental rules of statutory construction”
• explaining that courts “read the statute as a whole to ensure that no word, clause, sentence or phrase is rendered surplusage, superfluous, meaningless or nugatory” (cleaned up)
• explaining that courts “read the statute as a whole to ensure that no word, clause, sentence or phrase is rendered surplusage, superfluous, meaningless or nugatory” (cleaned up)
• noting that statutory interpretation “seek[s] to avoid constructions that are illogical, unreasonable, or inconsistent with common sense” (quoting Della Ratta v. Dyas, 414 Md. 556, 567 (2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).