Fox Electric, L.L.C. v. Moghimi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• improper exclu- sion of evidence central to defendant’s defense that he was not source of semen found in sexual assault victim was not harmless error
• improper exclusion of evidence central to defendant’s defense was not harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).