Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• correcting defects in work already performed does not extend filing period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Copco Steel & Engineering Co. v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1965-02-19· cited 28×
• Arch Sellery, Inc. v. Simpson
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1961-04-11· cited 23×
• Wooldridge Construction Co. v. First National Bank
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-07-16· cited 15×
• Gene McVety, Inc. v. Don Grady Homes, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-07· cited 14×
• Sawyer v. Sawyer
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1959-03-03· cited 12×
• Mercer Steel Co. v. Park Construction Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-02-16· cited 11×
• Christenson v. Behrens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-06-20· cited 10×
• Morgan v. O'Malley Lumber Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1932-01-19· cited 8×
• Smith v. DeKraay
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-07-29· cited 7×
• Central Coast Electric, Inc. v. Mendell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-12-07· cited 6×
• Tabet Lumber Company v. Baughman
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-04-08· cited 3×
• Dallas Lumber & Supply Co. v. Phillips
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-01-31· cited 3×
• Pro Excavating, Inc. v. Ziebart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-06-11· cited 2×
• California Nursery Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1944-10-02

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Avery v. Butler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1897-01-18· cited 12×