Fowler v. Valencourt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• viewing a sample of the subject import before concluding that it is covered by an eo nomine provision for hinges
• “[T]he sample of the imported merchandise . . . is itself a potent witness . . . .”
• \[W]e think that the primary function of the imported article should govern classification.\
• “[W]e think that the primary function of the imported article should govern classification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).