Skip to main content

Fowler v. State

Citations

  • 544 S.W.3d 844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police officer authenticated store surveillance video by cross-referencing time on receipt found on scene with time stamp on video
  • holding that police officer authenticated store surveillance video by cross-referencing time on receipt found on scene with time stamp on video
  • explaining that Rule 901 “merely requires some evidence sufficient to support a finding that evidence in question is what the proponent claims”
  • providing that the receipt with a date and time stamp matched the date and time stamp of the store surveillance videotaped recording of the appellant purchasing the items
  • relying on date and time on surveillance videotape and part of circumstantial evidence used to authenticate
  • noting the State could have done more to authenticate the video

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.