Skip to main content
· 6/27/1940

Fowler v. Baker

Citations

  • 32 F. Supp. 783
  • 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even though payments on promissory notes were “expressed in terms of royalties,” they were not expressed as conditioned upon such royalties being earned, and thus were not royalty payments
  • directing the discounting to present value of claim asserted in respect of payments under three promissory notes that were non-interest bearing until after their maturity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.