Fowler v. Attenborough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the fact that defendant’s employees may have been in the vicinity of the accident” was not “sufficient to establish constructive notice”
• “The observation after the accident that the banana peel was crushed and dirty does not warrant the inference that the banana peel was in such a condition prior to the accident since the manner in which the accident occurred would leave a banana peel dirty and crushed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).