Skip to main content
· 2/11/2016

FOWLER, STEVEN L., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaching a similar result when a district court order \did not specify\ which of two statutory sections for mandatory and discretionary restitution it relied on, on the basis that it was proper under the mandatory restitution statute
  • “An email address has long counted as a wire communication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.