Skip to main content
· 2/20/1896

Fouts v. City of New Whatcom

Citations

  • 14 Wash. 49
  • 44 P. 111
  • 1896 Wash. LEXIS 304

Syllabus

<p>VACATION OF STREET — PAROL TESTIMONY TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD — SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE.</p> <p>It is competent to establish the giving of notice of an application for the vacation of a street by parol proof, when the records are silent on the matter of notice, but show the filing of the petition, that it was contested, and, after due consideration, granted.</p> <p>Proof of the posting of notices, made by the person who posted them, is not overcome by the testimony of an interested party that he had not seen such notices and that he would have been likely to have seen them if they had been posted.</p>

Judges: Anders, Dunbar, Gordon, Hoyt, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.