Foust v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a claim that Commission should have established presorted mail as a subclass
• rejecting a claim that Commission should have established presorted mail as a subclass
• the Board, and not the PRC, has exclusive authority to manage and to make policy decisions for the Postal Service, and reductions in Postal Service contingency fund recommended by the PRC \improperly encroached on the managerial authority of the Board\
• expressly noting that \the PRC sent out a Notice of Inquiry eleven days after the evidentiary record had closed and gave the parties seven days to file briefs and twenty days to comment\ but that \[n]o discovery or cross-examination was permitted\
• the Board, and not the PRC, has exclusive authority to manage and to make policy decisions for the Postal Service, and reductions in Postal Service contingency fund recommended by the PRC “improperly encroached on the managerial authority of the Board”
• expressly noting that “the PRC sent out a Notice of Inquiry eleven days after the evidentiary record had closed and gave the parties seven days to file briefs and twenty days to comment” but that “[n]o discovery or cross-examination was permitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).