Skip to main content
· 10/15/1886

Fourth National Bank v. Altheimer

Citations

  • 91 Mo. 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employee filed a safety complaint that temperatures at the employer’s production plant were excessive in violation of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act
  • in context of whistleblowers’ claims, questions of law resolved in a manner which “best effectuates the manifest purpose of the [A]ct”
  • “Whether or not we would have reached a different conclusion, based upon the weight of the evidence, is of no consequence since we will not substitute our judgment for that of the [lower tribunal]” on a matter of judicial discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norton, Other

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.