· 10/15/1886
Fourth National Bank v. Altheimer
Citations
- 91 Mo. 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employee filed a safety complaint that temperatures at the employer’s production plant were excessive in violation of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act
- in context of whistleblowers’ claims, questions of law resolved in a manner which “best effectuates the manifest purpose of the [A]ct”
- “Whether or not we would have reached a different conclusion, based upon the weight of the evidence, is of no consequence since we will not substitute our judgment for that of the [lower tribunal]” on a matter of judicial discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norton, Other
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.