Fournier v. Zickefoose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the BOP retains discretion under the Second Chance Act to decide whether and when an inmate should be placed in an RRC[.]” (quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that the “BOP retains discretion under the Second Chance Act to decide whether and when an inmate should be placed at an RRC” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting “the BOP ‘retains discretion under the Second Chance Act to decide whether and when an inmate should be placed at an RRC, provided such pre-release confinement is practicable and the BOP considers the statutory factors.’”
• habeas petition seeking placement at RRC would become moot if petitioner was released to RRC
• “the BOP retains discretion under the Second Chance Act to decide whether and when an inmate should be placed in an RRC.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “the BOP retains discretion under the Second Chance Act to decide whether and when an inmate should be placed in an RRC.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).