Four Seasons Manufacturing, Inc. v. 1001 Coliseum, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding parties may contract to limit damages as long as the limitation is “so definite and positive in its terms as to show the clear intention of the parties”
• providing that “the parties’ intent is determined from the four corners of the document”
• affirming the trial court's determination that fraud was committed in the transfer of assets as a basis for piercing the corporate veil of the company
• “The court must accept an interpretation of the contract that harmonizes its provisions, as opposed to one that causes the provisions to conflict.”
• \There is a logical disconnect between the trial court's decision that FSM is liable to Coliseum for its role in the fraudulent transfer but is not a debtor to Coliseum.\
• we will not add provisions not agreed upon by the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).