Skip to main content
· 11/23/2005

Fountain v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles

Citations

  • 938 So. 2d 973
  • 2005 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 227
  • 2005 WL 3118933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding awards of attorney’s fees and expert witness fees as within trial court’s sound discretion under § 46b-62
  • suggesting it is improper for court to ‘‘[count] the same basis for a financial award in dissolution cases twice, once as an asset of his estate subject to allocation and again, as a component of his earning capacity forming the basis for alimony’’
  • interest in contested inheritance not distributable but may be addressed under § 46b-86 when value ascertained and parties' financial circumstances determined
  • interest in contested inheritance not distributable but may be addressed under § 46b-86 when value ascertained and parties’ financial circumstances determined
  • court uniquely qualified to determine whether financial award would be undermined by rejecting wife’s request for counsel fees and expenses
  • appropriate for the court to consider an asset that has vested but not yet been received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baschab, Cobb, McMillan, Shaw, Wise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.