Founders Insurance v. Contreras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no coverage existed under an automobile policy because no one gave the driver permission to use the car, and noting that the “initial permission rule” entitles subsequent drivers to be an insured “barring theft or tortious conversion”
• summary judgment, reviewed de novo, is proper where the pleadings, depositions, admissions, affidavits and other relevant matters on file show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).