Skip to main content
· 12/7/1983

Fouch v. State, Alcoholic Beverage Control Div.

Citations

  • 662 S.W.2d 181
  • 10 Ark. App. 139
  • 1983 Ark. App. LEXIS 935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where we found a lack of substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that a new retail liquor outlet would greatly increase the existing traffic problem where the testimony was that the new store would not cause any more of a traffic problem than a restaurant or other facility
  • where we found a lack of substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that a new retail liquor outlet would greatly increase the existing traffic problem where the testimony was that the new store would not cause any more of a traffic problem than a restaurant or other facility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Mayfield, Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.