Skip to main content
· 6/1/1993

Fotta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 626 A.2d 1144
  • 534 Pa. 191
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the claimant’s disability was due in part to a work-related incident, claimant was entitled to WC benefits
  • refusing to consider a revised medical report not considered by the tribunals below
  • review is limited to matters appearing in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy and Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.