Foston v. Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court erred in imposing sanctions pursuant to Rule 37(d) because plaintiff appeared at his deposition and answered questions
• \The plain language of Rule 37(b) requires that a court order be in effect before sanctions are imposed\
• “The plain language of Rule 37(b) requires that a court order be in effect before sanctions are imposed.”
• motion to dismiss for failure to participate in deposition is properly considered under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).