Foster v. Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding HMO subscriber had standing to sue doctor as third party beneficiary of contract between doctor and HMO because provision of medical services by doctor to subscriber directly discharged doctor’s contractual obligations to HMO
• plaintiff was intended beneficiary of contractual provisions that described nature of medical services to be provided, but not to all aspects of contract
• subscriber to health maintenance organization [HMO] may maintain claim against physician as third-party beneficiary of contract between HMO and physician based on physician's failure to timely provide services to subscriber required by contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).