Foster v. Svenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he exemption has been applied in cases addressing written and nonwritten materials published or televised for the purpose of entertainment.”
• “Courts . . . have refused to adopt a literal construction of these terms because the advertising and trade limitations of the privacy statute were drafted with the First Amendment in mind.”
• works of art are excluded from the statutes’ ambit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).