Skip to main content

Foster v. State

Citations

  • 656 S.E.2d 838
  • 283 Ga. 47
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 228
  • 2008 Ga. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing legal distinctions between insanity, mental illness and mental retardation
  • “A defendant claiming insanity has the burden of proving this affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence.”
  • “When a defense of insanity has been interposed, OCGA § 17-7-131 (c
  • “A defendant claiming insanity has the burden of proving this affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence; unless the evidence of insanity is overwhelming, a jury determination that the defendant was sane at the time of the crime will be upheld.”
  • “A defendant claiming insanity has the burden of proving this affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence; unless the evidence of insanity is overwhelming, a jury determination that the defendant was sane at the time of the crime will be upheld.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.