Foster v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a child-support order entered in compliance with remand instructions from this court should be retroactive to the date of the divorce judgment reversed by this court
• holding that a child-support order entered in compliance with remand instructions from this court should be retroactive to the date of the divorce judgment reversed by this court
• parental support is a fundamental right
• parental support is a fundamental right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kreitzberg v. Kreitzberg
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2013-04-19· cited 8×
• Burkett v. Gresham
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2004-02-13· cited 7×
• Peterson v. Roden
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2006-08-04· cited 1×
• Wojtala v. Wojtala
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2018-07-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martin v. Martin
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-03-25· cited 132×
• State Ex Rel. Shellhouse v. Bentley
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1995-07-14· cited 56×
• Town of Daphne v. City of Fairhope
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1969-08-07· cited 14×
• Foster v. Foster
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1998-02-20· cited 3×