Nevada Supreme Court· 12/27/2012

Foster v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Citations

128 Nev. 773
291 P.3d 150
128 Nev. Adv. Rep. 71
2012 WL 6754112
2012 Nev. LEXIS 123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that in a negligence cause of action, \a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to entrants for risks that exist on the landowner's property\
concluding that irrespective of whether a 14 risk was open and obvious there were material issues of fact to decide whether the 15 defendant had exercised reasonable care in permitting plaintiff to encounter the “existing 16 conditions”
holding that a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to land entrants even if a dangerous condition is open and obvious and reasoning that apportionment of liability depends on the landowner's breach of that duty and comparative fault
concluding a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care for risks existing on the landowner's property
adopting the uniform duty of care as stated in the Third Restatement
providing, negligence \is generally a question of fact for the jury to resolve.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Hardesty, Pickering

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.