Fossas v. Acevedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that precedent from the boards of review and “the clear and unequivocal command of the statute’s language”. lead to the conclusion that “an accused is entitled as a matter of right to the association of his appointed defense counsel with his individually employed attorneys”
• emphasizing that precedent from the boards of review and “the clear and unequivocal command of the statute’s language” lead to the conclusion that “an accused is entitled as a matter of right to the association of his appointed defense counsel with his individually employed attorneys”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).