Foss v. Hinkell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “any issue that can be raised on appeal must be raised, and that [any such] issue ‘will not be considered in a subsequent appeal in the same case’ ... [even when] the first appeal of the case ... was dismissed as untimely” (citations omitted)
• applying OCGA § 9-11-60 (h) to the holding in this Court's previous opinion in the same case that the evidence was sufficient to authorize a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
• applying OCGA § 9-11-60 (h) to the holding in this Court’s previous opinion in the same case that the evidence was sufficient to authorize a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
• “In a second appeal after remand for resentencing, a criminal defendant may raise issues relating to the new sentencing order but may not raise issues that were, or could have been, raised in the first appeal of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).