Forward Montana v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under Parratt, availability of post-termination contract action in state court should satisfy due process where state breaches employment contract
• predeprivation process \neither practical nor appropriate ... where clearly established state policies were involved and ignored due to negligence or otherwise\
• “Legitimate, and reasonable reliance on a promise from the state can be the source of property rights protected under the Due Process Clause.... ”
• predeprivation process “neither practical nor appropriate ... where clearly established state policies were involved and ignored due to negligence or otherwise”
• “Legitimate and reasonable reliance on a promise from the state can be the source of property rights protected” by due process
• teacher's two-year contract possibly beyond the power of school board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).