Skip to main content
· 2/27/1961

Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc. v. Novack

Citations

  • 127 So. 2d 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]his occasional offer of a limited amount of work over such a short time period is simply not enough to demonstrate that [Claimant] is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll, Chas, Horton, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.