Fortune/Forsythe v. Fortune

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the amended petition for reconsideration was actually a petition for modification and thus finding it proper to look beyond the title of the amended petition and consider its contents in order to characterize it
• holding that the amended petition for reconsideration was actually a petition for modification and thus finding it proper to look beyond the title of the amended petition and consider its contents in order to characterize it
• stating that a “trial court's refusal to reconsider [an] order is not final and reviewable”
• the substance rather than the form of a motion is controlling in determining procedural issues
• where it was determined that court had entered an order on a petition for modification of support alleging a change in financial conditions, which was final and appeal- able, rather than on a petition for reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).