Skip to main content
· 3/2/2011

Fortune v. Holder

Citations

  • 767 F. Supp. 2d 116
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21136
  • 2011 WL 723111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a claim accrues on the date of the adverse employment action and not when plaintiff learns of the discriminatory motive for that action
  • collecting cases in which courts dismissed Title VII claims on exhaustion grounds where it was clear that the complainant had not contacted an EEO counselor within 45 days of the alleged act of discrimination
  • subject matter jurisdiction over Rehabilitation Act claim existed despite agency’s dismissal of plaintiffs administrative complaint as untimely
  • subject matter jurisdiction over Rehabilitation Act claim existed despite agency’s 7 dismissal of plaintiff’s administrative complaint as untimely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.