Fortson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he admission of relevant evidence that is challenged on the basis that its probative value is outweighed by its prejudicial impact is within the sound discretion of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-01-22· cited 56×
• Slaughter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-06· cited 13×
• Bufford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-06· cited 6×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-10-16· cited 3×
• Rowe v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-08-02· cited 1×
• Robert Bufford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Malcolm v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
• Ingram v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-11-27· cited 151×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1996-11-12· cited 68×
• Robbins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-05-04· cited 65×
• Carroll v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-09-16· cited 33×
• Fortson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-10-06· cited 18×
• Reed v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-03-07· cited 13×