Fortner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the allegation in the context of a plea that trial counsel failed to move to suppress an incriminating statement constituted a facially sufficient claim
• holding that the allegation in the context of a plea that trial counsel failed to move to suppress an incriminating statement constituted a facially sufficient claim
• holding that the allegation in the context of a plea that trial counsel failed to move to suppress an incriminating statement constituted a facially sufficient claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-14· cited 20×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-19· cited 10×
• Cambrick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-14· cited 7×
• Jenrette v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-19· cited 7×
• Fletcher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 6×
• Mancera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-19· cited 4×
• Durden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-30· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Cintron v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-26· cited 7×