Fortner v. Rueger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that verbal reprimands were “far too ephemeral in nature and effect as to be considered adverse employment actions”
• finding that instances of verbal and written reprimands or counseling did not constitute adverse employment actions
• finding that a term or condition of employment may be said to have been affected if there is a “demonstrable adverse impact on future employment opportunities or performances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).