Fortman v. Decker Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the exceptional nature of the discovery rule, the text and structure of § 1658, and the substantive area covered by the DPPA, all support application of the standard rule
• “Gabelli should be read as seriously undermining, if not rendering obsolete, earlier statements by the lower courts that the discovery rule operates as a default.”
• “Although Plain tiffs assert similar claims against the Moving Defendants, the claims against each stand alone, as no concert of action has been alleged.”
• dismissing DPPA claim as insufficiently detailed to satisfy Rule 8(a
• accesses by driver’s license number

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).