Fortier v. Field

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiff presents no evidence that 7 Defendant’s actions were actually driven by retaliatory intent.”
• “The statements in Scrivener were directly indicative of a discriminatory 20 animus towards Ms. Scrivener’s protected class and were statements from which the jury could 21 directly infer intent to discriminate against older applicants by not hiring them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).