Fortes v. Ramos, 96-5663 (2001)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[e]xpress preemption exists when Congress states the statute’s preemptive effect”
• explaining that “[e]xpress preemption exists when Congress states the statute’s preemptive effect”
• relying on federal law to supply the same preemption standards outlined above
• explaining the states' role in regulating the trucking industry under the ICCTA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).