Fort Scott Rapid-transit Railway Co. v. Page

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The customer’s testimony is relevant because it shows how the [employer] treated [the plaintiff] and other members of his race. That the customer was not an employee does not bar her testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).