Skip to main content
· 11/28/1924

Forsythe v. Pendleton County

Citations

  • 205 Ky. 770
  • 266 S.W. 639
  • 1924 Ky. LEXIS 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Landers’s analysis has been applied by federal courts to 14 California Labor Code claims
  • granting summary judgment on interference claim where employee “had not yet requested time off, nor did she have any concrete plans to do so”
  • “Hewett cannot use her potential need for FMLA leave as a ‘shield’ against a legitimate termination.”
  • “On the other hand, Landers does not require the 19 plaintiff to identify an exact calendar week or particular instance of denied overtime; 20 instead, the allegations need only give rise to a plausible inference that there was such an 21 instance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drury

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.