· 11/28/1924
Forsythe v. Pendleton County
Citations
- 205 Ky. 770
- 266 S.W. 639
- 1924 Ky. LEXIS 229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting Landers’s analysis has been applied by federal courts to 14 California Labor Code claims
- granting summary judgment on interference claim where employee “had not yet requested time off, nor did she have any concrete plans to do so”
- “Hewett cannot use her potential need for FMLA leave as a ‘shield’ against a legitimate termination.”
- “On the other hand, Landers does not require the 19 plaintiff to identify an exact calendar week or particular instance of denied overtime; 20 instead, the allegations need only give rise to a plausible inference that there was such an 21 instance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Drury
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.