· 2/3/1925
Forsyth v. O'Brien
Citations
- 3 F.2d 806
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3812
- 1925 A.M.C. 637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Wallace, as interpreted in Teece, “also extends to medical opinions in combined effect claims, where the examining physician only examines for one allowed condition”
- explaining that Wallace, as interpreted in Teece, “also extends to medical opinions in combined effect claims, where the examining physician only examines for one allowed condition”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.