Skip to main content
· 2/3/1925

Forsyth v. O'Brien

Citations

  • 3 F.2d 806
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3812
  • 1925 A.M.C. 637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Wallace, as interpreted in Teece, “also extends to medical opinions in combined effect claims, where the examining physician only examines for one allowed condition”
  • explaining that Wallace, as interpreted in Teece, “also extends to medical opinions in combined effect claims, where the examining physician only examines for one allowed condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.