Forsyth v. Doolittle
Citations
- 120 U.S. 73
- 7 S. Ct. 408
Syllabus
<p>In Illinois when a declaration in an action at law alleges a joint liability of two defendants,-a plea in bar which does not trayerse this allegation admits it, and makes the declarations of one defendant not served with process evidence against the other who has appeared .and answered.</p> <p>In an action by an attorney to recover for services rendered in defending a suit for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon a tract of land near a large town, and in preventing the foreclosure, and in bringing about a favorable sale of the property, evidence as to the- character of the land and its possible*value as a future suburb of the town is admissible.</p> <p>As the length of hypothetical statements presented to a witness to ascertain his opinion upon any matter, growing out’of the facts supposed, necessa-' rily depends upon the simple or complicated character of the transactions recited, and upon the number of particulars which must be considered for the formation of the opinion desired, it must in a p-eat degree be left to the discretion of the cóurt; and in-this case that discretion was properly exercised.</p>
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.