Forsyth Fin., L.L.C. v. Chaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to allow the district court to address constitutional questions in the first instance following legislative revision of the statute at issue
• denying application to vacate district court ruling because \[j]udicial precedents are presumptively correct and valuable to the legal community as a whole\ (quoting U.S. Bancorp, 513 U.S. at 26)
• “[W]e must act first and return this case to the [district court], which could then entertain motions .. . if necessary or appropriate.”
• “A permanent ban on speech seems highly unlikely to survive the test of strict scrutiny, one where the government must show that the statute is narrowly tailored to meet a compelling government interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).