Forsberg v. Edward Hospital & Health Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the expert’s section 2-622 report in that case, even if sufficient to be considered an affidavit, was nonetheless inadmissible in opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because it failed to comply with Rule 191(a)
• holding that the expert's section 2-622 report in that case, even if sufficient to be considered an affidavit, was nonetheless inadmissible in opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment because it failed to comply with Rule 191(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).