· 12/16/2002
Forrester v. Seven Seventeen HB St. Louis Redevelopment Corp.
Citations
- 784 N.E.2d 834
- 336 Ill. App. 3d 572
- 271 Ill. Dec. 280
- 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 1384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- advertising and general contact with customer in Illinois insufficient where customer chose to travel to defendant’s state
- finding Illinois did not have general jurisdiction over a hotel located in Missouri despite the hotel’s advertisement efforts to attract business from Illinois residents
- “The relevant inquiry is…whether the defendant performed any part of the contract in Illinois.”
- telephone book and website advertising
- telephone book and website advertising
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.