Skip to main content
· 12/16/2002

Forrester v. Seven Seventeen HB St. Louis Redevelopment Corp.

Citations

  • 784 N.E.2d 834
  • 336 Ill. App. 3d 572
  • 271 Ill. Dec. 280
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 1384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • advertising and general contact with customer in Illinois insufficient where customer chose to travel to defendant’s state
  • finding Illinois did not have general jurisdiction over a hotel located in Missouri despite the hotel’s advertisement efforts to attract business from Illinois residents
  • “The relevant inquiry is…whether the defendant performed any part of the contract in Illinois.”
  • telephone book and website advertising
  • telephone book and website advertising

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.