Forrester v. Forrester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming division of the monetary value of husband's acerued compensatory time where the accrued time could be converted to cash at any time during his employment
• explaining that pensions are “subject to equitable division”
• “The Family Court has ‘broad discretion’ in dividing marital property, in general, and pension plan benefits, in particular.”
• “Nine jurisdictions have determined that retirement plans that substitute for federal Social Security are subject to division as a marital asset. Four jurisdictions do not treat such plans as marital assets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).