Forrest v. Universal Savings Bank, F.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court need not credit allegations contradicted by exhibits attached to a complaint
• explaining that the court “review[s] the complaint and all exhibits attached to the complaint” on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion
• “Taking all facts pleaded in the complaint as true and construing all inferences in the plaintiff’s favor, we review the complaint and all exhibits attached to the complaint.”
• “Taking all facts pleaded in the complaint as true and construing all inferences in the plaintiff’s favor, we review the complaint and all exhibits attached to the complaint.”
• upholding district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs Fair Credit Reporting Act claim where, after review of relevant letter, court concluded that the letter offered plaintiff a “fair offer of credit” in accordance with FCRA requirements
• “A court is not bound by the party’s characterization of an exhibit and may independently examine and form its own opinions about the document.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).