Skip to main content
· 8/31/2010

Forrest v. Prine

Citations

  • 620 F.3d 739
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18151
  • 2010 WL 3398157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that officer’s use of force was reasonable where detainee threatened aggression, disruption, and physical attack
  • “No reasonable jury could believe that a police officer, although trained in the use of tasers, always hits precisely his target when the target is moving.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.