Skip to main content
· 3/25/1996

Forrest v. Ford

Citations

  • 324 Ark. 27
  • 918 S.W.2d 162
  • 1996 Ark. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • neither financial transaction theft nor identity theft, as charged, requires proof of any fact the other does not; because statutes provide different grades of punishment for same criminal act, defendant entitled to rule of lenity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.