· 3/25/1996
Forrest v. Ford
Citations
- 324 Ark. 27
- 918 S.W.2d 162
- 1996 Ark. LEXIS 199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- neither financial transaction theft nor identity theft, as charged, requires proof of any fact the other does not; because statutes provide different grades of punishment for same criminal act, defendant entitled to rule of lenity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corbin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.