Skip to main content
· 1/22/1991

Forrest City Machine Works, Inc. v. Erwin

Citations

  • 304 Ark. 321
  • 802 S.W.2d 140
  • 1991 Ark. LEXIS 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referring to the standard set forth in former OCGA § 24-9-67.1, the predecessor statute to OCGA § 24-7-702
  • referring to the standard set forth in former OCGA § 24-9-67.1, the predecessor statute to OCGA § 24-7-702
  • although ultimately finding proffered expert was not qualified, acknowledging that medical doctor does not have to practice in same specialty as defendant medical doctor to be qualified to submit expert affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Glaze, Holt, Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.