· 1/30/2009
Forni v. Review Bd. of Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development
Citations
- 900 N.E.2d 71
- 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 126
- 2009 WL 213436
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding claimant was entitled to new hearing when she did not receive actual notice
- “the Board does not dispute that Forni did not receive actual notice prior to the hearing; therefore, the presumption has been rebutted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.