Skip to main content
· 1/30/2009

Forni v. Review Bd. of Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development

Citations

  • 900 N.E.2d 71
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 126
  • 2009 WL 213436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claimant was entitled to new hearing when she did not receive actual notice
  • “the Board does not dispute that Forni did not receive actual notice prior to the hearing; therefore, the presumption has been rebutted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.