Fornaro, Carmine v. James, Kay Coles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that mandamus relief is available only when “there is no other adequate remedy available to plaintiff” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding that the CSRA’s “remedial provisions are exclusive, and may not be supplemented by the recognition of additional rights to judicial review having their sources outside the CSRA”
• noting that D.C. Circuit “cases have . . . recognized” “that no remedy was available under the APA for an employment claim as to which the CSRA provided no relief”
• explaining that limitations on judicial review also limit the APA’s waiver of sovereign immunity
• pointing to fact that each individual plaintiff and putative class member could file his own claim for benefits in denial of mandamus relief
• pointing to fact that each individual plaintiff and putative class member could file his own claim for benefits in denial of mandamus relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).