Formulabs, Inc. v. Hartley Pen Company and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that possible revelation of putative inter-venor’s trade secrets during adjudication of pending action is grounds for allowing intervention of right
• holding that under old Rule 24(a) the possible revelation of putative intervenor’s trade secrets, an issue collateral to the primary dispute, was grounds for allowing intervention of right
• finding an interest in a trade secret sufficient interests for intervention of right under Rule 24(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).